PRoC/PSoC BLE模块上提供RTLS实时定位系统吗？

在功能上，RTLS仅使用来自固定/已知设备位置的信号来通过信号强度和推断来确定当前位置。这使得它对于任何无线信号都是可行的，但是由于软件以多种方式实现，使得它变得更加困难。
任何具有无线或BLE功能的CyPress设备都可以用于实现RTLS。然而，我还没有看到使用特定的信令媒介编写RTLS系统的任何简单指南。如果需要HTTPS://OpenRTL.COM/PGE/RTLS，这里有一个定义良好的RTLS描述。
一般来说：设置大量的无线设备来传输独特的信息；在你的移动设备上读取该信息；根据信息、信号强度等来计算你的位置，然后将无线设备缩放到你想要覆盖的区域的大小。



     以下为原文
  Functionally, a RTLS just uses signals from fixed/known device locations to determine current position through signal-strength and inference. This makes it feasible for any wireless signal, but makes it more difficult due to software being implement-able in a large number of ways.
Any cypress device with wireless or BLE functionality can be used to implement a RTLS. I have not seen any easy guides on writing an RTLS system using a specific signaling-medium however. Here is a well-defined description of RTLS if you require: https://openrtls.com/page/rtls
Generally: Setup alot of wireless devices to transmit unique information; Read that information on your mobile device; Calculate your position based on the information, signal strength, etc. Then scale the wireless devices to the size of the area you want to cover.

你好，
非常感谢你的回答。所以应该是可能的，但在你看来，我还是有点困惑。他们提到RTLS精度来自于他们使用UWB（超宽带）技术。在这里我们讨论了蓝牙。我也发现了一些书，如果你键入谷歌UWB vs BLE，看起来这些技术是不同的。所以如果我错了请纠正我，但在这种情况下，PROC不能支持它。
谢谢你



     以下为原文
  Hello,
 
Thank you very much for the answer. So it should be possible but in your opinion but I am still a little confused. They mention that the RTLS accuracy came from the fact that they use UWB ( Ultra Wide Band ) technology. While here we talked about BlueTooth. Also I have found some books if you type in google UWB vs BLE and it looks that those technologies are different. So correct me if I am wrong but in this case PRoC cannot support it..
 
Thank you

RTLS是一种利用无线设备网络以快速方式同步位置和时间的系统/体系结构。UWB和BLE都是无线技术，因此我认为这是可能的，但是如果您正在查看已经实施的RTLS系统，那么选择PROC将需要开发/工作来建立RTLS架构（或者希望您能找到一个主要是在某个地方）的例子。完成了）。UWB是各种RTL的底层传输介质，但这并不意味着PROC不能支持类似于无线蓝牙的系统。
这是一个可以更好地解释它的类比：
RTLS就像一个运输公司，把包裹送到不同的房子/家里。
UWB是一种特定类型的汽车，比如说丰田
BLE将是另一种类型的汽车，比如说丰田塔科马
因此，你可以设置一个运输服务来运送包裹，并使用任何一辆车来做：高地人或塔科马。
如果你的包裹只适合高地人（RTLS是安装使用UWB），那么试着使用塔科马斯做同样的事情不会工作，因为包的形状适合高地人。如果你改变包装的形状，以适应塔科马，然而，它将工作在相当水平的高地。不幸的是，这将是不兼容的高地，因为包是一个不同的形状现在。
RTLS不是基于UWB或BLE，RTLS是一种使用无线设备来进行位置服务/跟踪的系统。这意味着你可以使用WiFi、蜂窝、GPS、DeaWAVE等，但是每一个实现都需要安装来使用你选择的无线协议/媒体。
如果您试图匹配使用UWB的RTLS系统，那么您需要一个支持UWB作为无线介质的设备。在这种情况下，你不能使用PROC，因为它上只有BLE收音机。如果你想从头开始执行你自己的RTLS系统，那么你可以在技术上使用任何无线介质（BLE、UWB、Wi-Fi等）。通过对这个问题做一些研究，人们认为UWB对于RTLS的使用更为准确。
我建议在ULE上使用UWB，但问题是“PROC可以用来制作RTLS吗？”仍然是肯定的。
既然你知道你对你的项目有什么要求，只有你能做出最好的选择。但是如果你真的想用BLE来做你的RTLS系统，那么PRC是个不错的选择。否则，如果您只想使用任何无线介质制作RTLS系统，那么您应该选择UWB，因为它被设计用于RTLS。



     以下为原文
  RTLS is a system/architecture of software that utilizes a network of wireless devices to synchronize location and time in a quick manner. UWB and BLE are both wireless technologies, and thus I would say it is possible, but if you are looking at an already-implemented RTLS system, then picking the PRoC would require devlopment/work on your side to setup the RTLS architecture (Or hoping you can find an example somewhere that is mostly done). UWB is the underlying transmission medium for various RTLS, but that doesn't mean the PRoC cannot support a similar system over wireless bluetooth.
 
Here's an analogy that might explain it better:
RTLS would be like a transportation company, that delivers packages to various houses/homes.
UWB is a specific type of car, let's say a Toyota Highlander
BLE would then be another type of car, let's say Toyota Tacoma
Thus, you could setup a transportation service to deliver packages and use either car to do so: Highlander or Tacoma
If your packages only fit in the Highlander (RTLS being setup to use UWB), then trying to use Tacomas to do the same thing won'y work, as the packages are shaped to fit in the Highlander. If you change the shape of the packages to fit the Tacoma instead however, it will work at a comparable level to the Highlander. Unfortunately, it would then be incompatible with the Highlander as the package is a different shape now.
 
RTLS is not based on the UWB or BLE, RTLS is a system of using wireless devices to do location services/tracking. This means that you could do it with WiFi, Cellular, GPS, Decawave, etc. But each implementation would need to be setup to use the wireless protocol/medium that you picked.
 
If you are trying to match an RTLS system that uses UWB, then you will need a device that supports UWB as the wireless medium. In that case, you can't use the PRoC as that only has the BLE radio on it. If you are looking to implement your own RTLS system from scratch, then you can technically use any wireless medium (BLE, UWB, Wi-Fi, etc.). From doing a little research into the matter, people say that UWB is more accurate for RTLS usage.
I would recommend using UWB over BLE, but the question "Can the PRoC be used to make an RTLS?" is still a definite Yes.
Since you know what requirements you have for your project, only you can make the best choice. But if you really really want to use BLE to do your RTLS system, then PRoC is a good choice. Otherwise, if you are only looking to make an RTLS system using any wireless medium, then you should probably pick UWB, as it was designed to be used for RTLS.

非常感谢你的详细回答。真的很感激。



     以下为原文
  Thank you very much for your detail answer. Really appreciate.

不客气！
埃普拉特



     以下为原文
  You're welcome!
 
Epratt